Home

[Whose marriage are you protecting, Renee Kosel?]

February 27, 2013

Late last night, I decided to check on the status of the marriage equality bill currently making its way through the state House of Representatives. The bill has already passed the Senate, but is facing its greatest challenge yet in the House, with last night’s vote being whether or not to advance the bill out of committee. Looking at the vote tally (it did make its way out of committee, thankfully), I was curious as to who voted against it. As I suspected, one of the dissenting votes came from Renée Kosel, the woman who has been the state representative for my hometown district since 1997. Her reasoning, again, as I suspected was that “the bill runs counter to her faith.” Sigh.

When will public servants realize that their own personal faith should have nothing to do with what the law of the land should be? To say, “it’s against my faith, so I don’t think this should be the law” is essentially saying, “I believe in x, and that’s protected by my right to religious freedom; and while you may not believe in x, I’m going to force my religious beliefs on you under penalty of law.” Isn’t that hugely flawed? Catholics don’t eat meat on Fridays during Lent, but you don’t see anyone proposing a law that would make the sale of beef and chicken on those days illegal, right? And why is that? It’s because it would be absurd to do that – just like it’s absurd that someone’s personal religious beliefs should be forced on others when it comes to marriage equality.

Speaking of religion, and those who proclaim that their opposition to marriage equality stems from simply a desire to “preserve the original intent of marriage;” have these people read that 2000 year old book they claim to follow?

The below comes from patheos.com, outlining the “biblical definition of marriage”:

Polygynous Marriage

Probably the most common form of marriage in the bible, it is where a man has more than one wife.

Levirate Marriage

When a woman was widowed without a son, it became the responsibility of the brother-in-law or a close male relative to take her in and impregnate her. If the resulting child was a son, he would be considered the heir of her late husband. See Ruth, and the story of Onan (Gen. 38:6-10).

A man, a woman and her property — a female slave

The famous “handmaiden” sketch, as preformed by Abraham (Gen. 16:1-6) and Jacob (Gen. 30:4-5).

A man, one or more wives, and some concubines

The definition of a concubine varies from culture to culture, but they tended to be live-in mistresses. Concubines were tied to their “husband,” but had a lower status than a wife. Their children were not usually  heirs, so they were safe outlets for sex without risking the line of succession. To see how badly a concubine could be treated, see the famous story of the Levite and his concubine (Judges 19:1-30).

A male soldier and a female prisoner of war

Women could be taken as booty from a successful campaign and forced to become wives or concubines. Deuteronomy 21:11-14 describes the process.

A male rapist and his victim

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 describes how an unmarried woman who had been raped must marry her attacker.

A male and female slave

A female slave could be married to a male slave without consent, presumably to produce more slaves.

and of course …

Monogamous, heterosexual marriage

What you might think of as the standard form of marriage, provided you think of arranged marriages as the standard. Also remember that inter-faith or cross-ethnic marriage were forbidden for large chunks of biblical history.

So which is it? Whose form of marriage are you trying to preserve? The hypocrisy is astounding. Shame on you.

Advertisements

3 Responses to “[Whose marriage are you protecting, Renee Kosel?]”


  1. This reminds me of all the doctors and pharmacists who whine that they shouldn’t have to provide contraception, even emergency contraception to RAPE VICTIMS, because it goes against their faith. (Facepalm) If it goes against your faith to do your job then get a new job. You have the freedom to practice your religion but not to force it on others.

    __

    Cool how they’re trying to protect traditional marriage but not protesting divorce. (awkward pause) Oh, my bad, I forgot. We’re cherry picking the Bible now. Not reading all of it.

    I’ve read the Bible cover to cover so whenever people try to quote something at me or tell me “the Bible says so” it kind of makes me shake my head, because I almost always know a) the verses they’re using, b) how they’ve left out part of the verse, c) how they’re misusing the original Hebrew or Greek interpretation and context, and d) another part of the Bible that completely contradicts them. I wish more of these people who try to thump the Bible would actually read and understand it first.

    I do still consider myself religious on some level but I refuse to set foot inside of a church anymore because I’m tired of people lying and abusing in the name of their religion, without even knowing what it is they supposedly believe. In my eyes these people are as bad as “holy Muslims” who blow themselves up “for Allah”.

    Kosel’s voting record is yet further proof of why I refuse to vote Republican. They are (at the risk of generalizing, which I try not to do) a very narrow-minded group of people who do not have the best interests of the larger community at heart. I honestly wonder about the IQ of any woman who votes Republican (well, people in general, but women especially!).

  2. jrparker2 Says:

    My name is Jonathan Parker and I am challenging Rep. Kosel in the 2014 election. I don’t have anything really official set up for my campaign yet, but please check out my Facebook page and see if I am someone you might be able to get behind.

    https://www.facebook.com/parker4illinois?ref=hl

  3. 2014 District 37 Democratic Candidate Says:

    Martha,
    I could not agree more. I am a member of the Human Rights Campaign and PFLAG, and feel disgusted by Kosel’s choice. I am not a Republican or part of the Tea Party Libertarian fringe, I am a Progressive Democrat. Ironically, I will be running in the 2014 campaign, as well. I hope to further the cause of human rights across the board. Thanks for speaking out, we need more folks like you!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: